sub-mission

Just another Today.com weblog

&
 

Sep 15 2008

slave vs boy?

Published by danmadden at 5:25 pm under Dom/me, Service, Sub/mission, Submissives Edit This

I’ve put off my posting about what defines a “slave”, a “boy” and such as these terms are going to ultimately be defined by the Dom and sub in their relationship. No two relationships are going to have the same protocols. For example, there is the commonly held belief that a slave must walk behind their Dom/me, but there are relationships, such as the one Master C has with his submissives where he expects them to walk in front of him so that he can look at their asses. The definitions are going to be defined by those in the relationship. A Master or Mistress who enjoys doing laundry isn’t any less a dominant than those who have their submissives fluff and fold.

When you are starting in a D/s relationship, especially if you are in a more isolated situation, you may only have the porn stories from the 70’s and 80’s as a guide, what I will be referring to as the Mythic Old Guard in the blog, but please have the recognition that the concept of the slave who stays locked in a cage while their Dom/me goes off to work is not only dangerous to the sub, but in this financial age very unlikely and besides shouldn’t it be the submissive who is out working while the Master or Mistress lives a life of leisure?

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

One Response to “slave vs boy?”

  1. Ericon 07 Oct 2008 at 7:37 am edit this

    I know a fellow who identifies as a Daddy — he has his boys walk in front of them so he can “keep an eye on them” he says. I don’t think it’s so much their asses he’s looking at, but more of a supervisory thing. I find it kind of hot.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not A Member? Register for Free!